numeric weights make the relative preference explicit, so you don't have to wonder whether they meant /either is totally fine/ or /I prefer the first, but the second is okay too/
…which means that second example should actually be `Accept-Pronouns: they/them;q=1, she/her;q=1` (otherwise it's just as ambiguous as not using this protocol, for creatures who are interpreting it intuitively)
@moonbolt So maybe something like
((he/him 1) (they/them 0.8) ("when beastly" (it/its 1) (he/him 0.99)))
@moonbolt Although I'm not sure that really covers "if you know what you're doing", but I suppose that'd just be another condition.
@IceWolf …hmm…a problem with these syntaxes
it's ambiguous whether other pronouns are included in the conditional list